FE-518: Add Storybook and update build/lint setup for refractive by kube · Pull Request #8549 · hashintel/hash

kube · 2026-03-15T16:35:32Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Modernizes the build, lint, and dev tooling for @hashintel/petrinaut, @apps/petrinaut-website, and @hashintel/refractive to use the latest versions of Vite, oxlint, and the React Compiler plugin — and aligns all three packages on the same configuration patterns.

🔗 Related links

FE-518 (internal)
H-6324 (internal)

🔍 What does this change?

Migrate petrinaut & petrinaut-website from ESLint to oxlint

Replace eslint.config.js with .oxlintrc.json in both packages
Enable --type-aware linting and --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error
Add jsx-a11y, unicorn plugins; promote all warn rules to error
Fix all newly-surfaced lint violations (unused disables, missing use no memo, etc.)
Add CLAUDE.md for petrinaut with stack/conventions docs

Upgrade dev tooling across all three packages

@vitejs/plugin-react 5.x → 6.0.1
@typescript/native-preview → 7.0.0-dev.20260315.1
rolldown-plugin-dts → 0.22.5, storybook → 10.2.19
Switch React Compiler setup from inline babel.plugins to @rolldown/plugin-babel + reactCompilerPreset
Drop unused devDependencies from petrinaut

Add Storybook to @hashintel/refractive

Add .storybook/ config and playground.stories.tsx (replaces old playground/ directory)
Remove the old playground app

Align @hashintel/refractive config with petrinaut

Adopt identical .oxlintrc.json, tsconfig.json (noFallthroughCasesInSwitch), and Vite config patterns
Add oxlint-tsgolint, @rolldown/plugin-babel devDependencies
Rename uppercase constant functions (CONVEX → convex, etc.) to satisfy new-cap rule

Monorepo fixes

Exclude node_modules from workspace glob to fix turbo duplicate package error
Add web-worker to hash-frontend for elkjs compatibility
Extract ui-subviews.ts constant in petrinaut to fix circular reference

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

modifies an npm-publishable library and I have added a changeset file(s)

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this

🛡 What tests cover this?

yarn lint:eslint and yarn lint:tsc pass for all three packages
yarn build succeeds for @hashintel/refractive and @hashintel/petrinaut

vercel · 2026-03-15T16:35:36Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		Mar 15, 2026 10:55pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 15, 2026 10:55pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Mar 15, 2026 10:55pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Mar 15, 2026 10:55pm

kube · 2026-03-15T16:35:54Z

FE-43: Add alternative OBB and polar distance map filters for refractive #8552
FE-518: Add Storybook and update build/lint setup for refractive #8549 👈 (View in Graphite)
H-6324: Migrate petrinaut to oxlint and verify React Compiler #8539 : 4 other dependent PRs (#8532 , #8537 , #8541 and 1 other)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

cursor · 2026-03-15T16:36:12Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Moderate risk because it changes @hashintel/refractive’s published build output (ESM-only), exported API names (CONVEX/LIP → convex/lip), and its type/lint/build pipeline, which could impact downstream consumers and CI.

Overview
Adds Storybook-based development for @hashintel/refractive by introducing .storybook config and a Playground story, replacing the previous Vite playground/ app.

Modernizes @hashintel/refractive packaging/tooling: replaces ESLint config with .oxlintrc.json (oxlint + type-aware lint), updates tsconfig.json/scripts to use tsgo, upgrades Vite/React plugin, and switches the build to a rolldown-based ESM library output with rolldown-plugin-dts.

API/usage adjustments: renames surface equation exports to lowerCamelCase (CONVEX_CIRCLE/CONVEX/CONCAVE/LIP → convexCircle/convex/concave/lip) and updates consumers (e.g., ds-components Switch) plus a small logic tweak in calculateRoundedSquareMap around maximumDistanceToBorder handling. Also updates the root workspace globs to exclude node_modules.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4c2a6f1. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-03-15T16:40:06Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR modernizes the @hashintel/refractive package’s developer workflow by adding Storybook and switching the build/lint toolchain to newer Vite/Rolldown + Oxlint tooling.

Changes:

Added Storybook configuration (.storybook/main.ts, .storybook/preview.ts) and a new playground story under stories/
Removed the old Vite “playground” dev app and repurposed yarn dev to run Storybook
Replaced the ESLint setup with an .oxlintrc.json and updated lint scripts to use oxlint + type-aware checks
Updated TypeScript config to a stricter, standalone tsconfig.json and adjusted includes for Storybook + stories
Updated Vite config to Vite 8 / Rolldown options and swapped DTS generation to rolldown-plugin-dts
Renamed and re-exported surface-equation helpers (camelCase) and updated internal imports
Minor story/content tweaks (e.g., improved alt text in example story)

Technical Notes: The library build now targets ESM output only and declares types from dist/index.d.ts, while Storybook provides the primary interactive dev environment.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 3 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

augmentcode · 2026-03-15T16:40:06Z

libs/@hashintel/refractive/.oxlintrc.json

+      { "button": true, "submit": true, "reset": false }
+    ],
+
+    "react-hooks/rules-of-hooks": "error",


Oxlint’s Rules of Hooks rules are react/rules-of-hooks (and react/exhaustive-deps), so react-hooks/* here may be treated as unknown/ignored and leave hooks unenforced.

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

Re: react-hooks rules — oxlint supports react-hooks/* syntax, same as petrinaut's config. No change needed.

augmentcode · 2026-03-15T16:40:06Z

libs/@hashintel/refractive/src/helpers/surface-equations.ts

 export type SurfaceFnDef = (x: number) => number;

-export const CONVEX_CIRCLE: SurfaceFnDef = (x) => Math.sqrt(1 - (1 - x) ** 2);
+export const convexCircle: SurfaceFnDef = (x) =>


These exports were renamed from CONVEX*/CONCAVE/LIP to camelCase, and src/main.ts re-exports them, so this is a public API breaking change for any downstream imports. It may be worth confirming versioning/changelog expectations for this rename.

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

Fixed in 4c2a6f1 — updated the consumer in ds-components/switch.tsx to use the new names.

augmentcode · 2026-03-15T16:40:07Z

libs/@hashintel/refractive/package.json

  "sideEffects": false,
-  "main": "./dist/index.cjs",
-  "module": "./dist/index.js",
+  "main": "./dist/index.js",


This package now appears to be ESM-only (type: "module", main points to dist/index.js, and the Vite config builds only es), which will break CommonJS require() consumers if any exist.

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

Intentional — ESM-only, same as @hashintel/petrinaut. All consumers use bundlers.

codspeed-hq · 2026-03-15T16:40:43Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing cf/fe-518-add-storybook-and-update-build-setup (4c2a6f1) with main (46e4caf)}

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

libs/@hashintel/refractive/package.json

libs/@hashintel/refractive/src/helpers/surface-equations.ts

graphite-app · 2026-03-15T16:41:58Z

libs/@hashintel/refractive/vite.config.ts

-import react from "@vitejs/plugin-react";
+import babel from "@rolldown/plugin-babel";
+import react, { reactCompilerPreset } from "@vitejs/plugin-react";
+import { dts } from "rolldown-plugin-dts";


Replace the import of 'rolldown-plugin-dts' with 'vite-plugin-dts' to fix the compatibility issue with rolldown. Change to: import dts from 'vite-plugin-dts';

Spotted by Graphite (based on CI logs)

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

rolldown-plugin-dts is correct — same as petrinaut. vite-plugin-dts is the old approach.

graphite-app · 2026-03-15T16:42:06Z

libs/@hashintel/refractive/vite.config.ts

+      dts({ tsgo: true }).map((plugin) =>
+        // Ensure runs before Vite's native TypeScript transform
+        plugin.name.endsWith("fake-js")
+          ? { ...plugin, enforce: "pre" }
+          : plugin,
+      ),


Replace the rolldown-plugin-dts configuration with vite-plugin-dts configuration. Change to: dts({ rollupTypes: true, insertTypesEntry: true, exclude: ['/.stories.', '/.test.'], copyDtsFiles: false, outDir: 'dist' })

Spotted by Graphite (based on CI logs)

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

rolldown-plugin-dts with tsgo: true is the intended setup, matching petrinaut.

Replace the playground/ dev server with Storybook for component development and visual testing. - Remove playground/ folder and its Vite dev server setup - Add Storybook 9 with @storybook/react-vite framework - Create playground story showing refractive glass effect over scrollable article content - Simplify vite.config.ts for lib-only builds (Storybook handles dev) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…cate package error Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Replace ESLint with oxlint, tsc with tsgo, upgrade to Vite 8 + Storybook 10, switch to ES-only output with rolldown-plugin-dts for declaration generation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Bump Storybook from 10.2.13 to 10.2.19 for Vite 8 compatibility - Update ds-components/switch.tsx to use renamed `lip` export Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

github-actions · 2026-03-16T00:10:58Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.878 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$49.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$47.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$418 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.717 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$91.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$292 \mathrm{ms} \pm 842 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.668 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$36.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.837 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$93.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 543 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 669 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 623 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 639 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 454 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$568 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) labels Mar 15, 2026

kube mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2026

FE-514: Add SymPy → JavaScript compilation pipeline via Pyodide #8548

Draft

15 tasks

kube marked this pull request as ready for review March 15, 2026 16:36

graphite-app bot assigned kube Mar 15, 2026

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hashdotdesign March 15, 2026 16:38 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – petrinaut March 15, 2026 16:39 Failure

augmentcode bot reviewed Mar 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

cursor bot reviewed Mar 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@hashintel/refractive/package.json Show resolved Hide resolved

libs/@hashintel/refractive/src/helpers/surface-equations.ts Show resolved Hide resolved

graphite-app bot reviewed Mar 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 15, 2026 16:45 Failure

kube changed the base branch from cf/h-6324-migrate-petrinaut-to-oxlint-and-verify-react-compiler to graphite-base/8549 March 15, 2026 16:58

kube force-pushed the graphite-base/8549 branch from 17e5684 to ccc9e08 Compare March 15, 2026 18:09

kube force-pushed the cf/fe-518-add-storybook-and-update-build-setup branch from 132f9b3 to a0766e7 Compare March 15, 2026 18:09

kube changed the base branch from graphite-base/8549 to cf/h-6324-migrate-petrinaut-to-oxlint-and-verify-react-compiler March 15, 2026 18:09

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hashdotdesign March 15, 2026 18:12 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – petrinaut March 15, 2026 18:13 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 15, 2026 18:19 Failure

kube changed the base branch from cf/h-6324-migrate-petrinaut-to-oxlint-and-verify-react-compiler to graphite-base/8549 March 15, 2026 18:33

kube force-pushed the cf/fe-518-add-storybook-and-update-build-setup branch from a0766e7 to e6353b8 Compare March 15, 2026 18:33

kube force-pushed the graphite-base/8549 branch from ccc9e08 to 6cecb10 Compare March 15, 2026 18:33

kube changed the base branch from graphite-base/8549 to cf/h-6324-migrate-petrinaut-to-oxlint-and-verify-react-compiler March 15, 2026 18:33

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hashdotdesign March 15, 2026 18:36 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – petrinaut March 15, 2026 18:37 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 15, 2026 18:43 Failure

Base automatically changed from cf/h-6324-migrate-petrinaut-to-oxlint-and-verify-react-compiler to main March 15, 2026 19:38

kube and others added 3 commits March 15, 2026 23:37

FE-518: Exclude node_modules from workspace glob to fix turbo dupli…

4e1b564

…cate package error Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

FE-518: Modernize refractive build and lint setup

f34deb3

Replace ESLint with oxlint, tsc with tsgo, upgrade to Vite 8 + Storybook 10, switch to ES-only output with rolldown-plugin-dts for declaration generation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

kube force-pushed the cf/fe-518-add-storybook-and-update-build-setup branch from e6353b8 to f34deb3 Compare March 15, 2026 22:38

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hashdotdesign March 15, 2026 22:41 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – petrinaut March 15, 2026 22:41 Failure

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 15, 2026 22:42 Failure

FE-518: Fix PR review findings for refractive

4c2a6f1

- Bump Storybook from 10.2.13 to 10.2.19 for Vite 8 compatibility - Update ds-components/switch.tsx to use renamed `lip` export Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

kube mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2026

FE-43: Add alternative OBB and polar distance map filters for refractive #8552

Draft

15 tasks

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 15, 2026 22:53 Failure

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 15, 2026 22:54 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 15, 2026 22:55 View deployment

CiaranMn approved these changes Mar 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Conversation

kube commented Mar 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kube commented Mar 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Mar 15, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kube Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kube Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kube Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kube Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kube Mar 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

kube commented Mar 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Mar 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

kube commented Mar 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Mar 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading