feat: added Worker1 Promiser types #137
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Full disclosure: this was kind of vibe-coded
Since our source files from upstream now include comments, I assigned an AI agent to read the source and contents of these issues (#53, https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite-wasm/pull/54/changes) and attempt to reverse-engineer the types.
The result doesn't seem that awful at first glance, with the exception of a couple of
anys which I'll attempt to type more strictly.I don't really use the promiser API, so I'd appreciate feedback from actual users.