Refactor code quality workflow to separate linting and SonarQube jobs#3
Refactor code quality workflow to separate linting and SonarQube jobs#3anatolyshipitz merged 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Changes: - Introduced a new SonarQube job for code analysis
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughA new job named Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant Repository
participant SonarQube
GitHub Actions->>Repository: Checkout (fetch-depth: 0)
GitHub Actions->>SonarQube: Run scan (authenticate with SONAR_TOKEN)
SonarQube-->>GitHub Actions: Return analysis results
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (3)
18-18: Replace placeholder lint command with actual linter
Thelintjob currently just echoes"Linting...". Please update this step to invoke the real lint tool(s) your project uses (e.g.,eslint,flake8, etc.) so that linting is actually performed.
20-30: Consider adding a dependency on lint
By default,sonarquberuns in parallel withlint. If you'd rather only run the Sonar scan after linting passes, you can add:sonarqube: needs: lintOtherwise, running in parallel is fine for faster feedback.
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
30-30: Add trailing newline
YAML lint reports a missing end‑of‑file newline. Please add a blank line at the end to satisfy formatting rules.🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (2)
20-30: Dedicated SonarQube job is well‑scoped
The newsonarqubejob cleanly separates SonarQube analysis from linting. It correctly checks out the repo with full history (fetch-depth: 0) and leverages the official SonarSource action.🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
29-30: Verify SONAR_TOKEN secret configuration
Make sure theSONAR_TOKENsecret is set up in this repo’s settings and has the correct permissions. If it’s missing or mis‑configured, the SonarQube step will fail.🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
- Created sonar-project.properties file - Set project key and organization for SonarQube integration
…utomatization into feature/add_sonarqube
|
2 participants
Changes:
Summary by CodeRabbit