Skip to content

Dummy PR to test coverage test changes in CI#114917

Draft
Zalathar wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Zalathar:dummy-coverage
Draft

Dummy PR to test coverage test changes in CI#114917
Zalathar wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Zalathar:dummy-coverage

Conversation

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023

The x86_64-gnu-llvm-15 job that normally runs on PRs doesn't include the profiler runtime, so most of the coverage tests don't get run on PRs.

(That's why #114875 didn't fail until an actual merge was attempted.)

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 17, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023

@rustbot experimental

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 17, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Success!

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/5885191281

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023

Now testing #114843 in CI on Linux/Windows/macOS, to ensure I don't get any nasty surprises after it's reviewed.

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 17, 2023

Success:

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 29, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115183) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Zalathar Zalathar force-pushed the dummy-coverage branch 2 times, most recently from b605cc7 to c4511d7 Compare September 2, 2023 00:08
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

Testing #114843 on Linux/Windows/macOS (coverage-map and run-coverage only), to see if everything still works on the big 3 configurations.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

Those Linux failures look like the same ones I saw on the aarch64-gnu build, so hopefully that's a platform issue and I don't have to worry about ARM Linux specifically.

I'm going to try another run of Windows only, to flush out any unknown issues on that platform.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

Test failures on Windows seem to be the same as the Linux ones, which is surprising.

Perhaps there is some common property of the main Linux/Windows CI environments that is not shared by x86_64-gnu-llvm-15 or my local Aarch64 macOS environment.

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

I'll try a CI macOS build to double check all the major platforms.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

Hmm, so the overall results so far seem to be:

Failure (probably the same failures, though I haven't fully verified this):

  • aarch64-gnu
  • x86_64-gnu
  • x86_64-msvc
  • x86_64-apple-1

Success:

  • x86_64-gnu-llvm-15
  • Local build on aarch64 macOS
  • Local build on aarch64 macOS (--stage=2)

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 2, 2023

Trying another build with the default PR CI config (x86_64-gnu-llvm-15) just to confirm again that that one still works.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 24, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #126788) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Zalathar Zalathar mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Merged
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Aug 24, 2024

Successful jobs:

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 25, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #129295) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 19, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #130534) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC added S-experimental Status: Ongoing experiment that does not require reviewing and won't be merged in its current state. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 26, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar Zalathar mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Merged
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 9, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #132584) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 18, 2025

@bors try jobs=x86_64-msvc-1,x86_64-msvc-2

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 18, 2025

@bors try cancel

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Zalathar commented Sep 18, 2025

@bors try jobs=x86_64-msvc-1,x86_64-msvc-2

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Sep 18, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: c6c118b (c6c118bb1e1008a1303c75dbecb39e1789670759, parent: 93117677d857bb7c3f12c9dc500d77839f8fb13d)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-experimental Status: Ongoing experiment that does not require reviewing and won't be merged in its current state. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@Zalathar @bors @rust-log-analyzer @rustbot @Dylan-DPC