Skip to content

clippy_dev parsing revamp part 7/N#16645

Open
Jarcho wants to merge 13 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Jarcho:dev_parse7
Open

clippy_dev parsing revamp part 7/N#16645
Jarcho wants to merge 13 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Jarcho:dev_parse7

Conversation

@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Feb 26, 2026

Based on #16644

All but the last commit are minor cleanups. The last commit is larger and adds significantly nicer error reporting. This is a huge QOL improvement when dealing with parsing failures. I'll also be using this for some internal cross crate linting since clippy proper isn't capable of those.

changelog: none

@Jarcho Jarcho added the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Feb 26, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 26, 2026

Some changes occurred in clippy_lints/src/doc

cc @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 26, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 26, 2026

r? @dswij

rustbot has assigned @dswij.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: 7 candidates
  • 7 candidates expanded to 7 candidates
  • Random selection from dswij, llogiq, samueltardieu

@Jarcho Jarcho force-pushed the dev_parse7 branch 2 times, most recently from 4ce53ef to b09d5df Compare March 3, 2026 19:35
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 4, 2026

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 5, 2026

☔ The latest upstream changes (possibly #16668) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants