Skip to content

Conversation

@olivergondza
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Same change now done in argo-cd: argoproj/argo-cd#26025

Uncomment only one /kind line, and delete the rest.
For example, > /kind bug would simply become: /kind bug

/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind failing-test
/kind enhancement
/kind documentation
/kind code-refactoring

What does this PR do / why we need it:

lint is sped up from 46s to 15s

Have you updated the necessary documentation?

  • [no] Documentation update is required by this PR.
  • [n/a] Documentation has been updated.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #?

Test acceptance criteria:

  • Unit Test
  • E2E Test

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Jan 21, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from keithchong and wtam2018 January 21, 2026 11:24
@jgwest
Copy link
Member

jgwest commented Jan 23, 2026

/retest

@olivergondza
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can we move on with this? It was merged in the upstream operator already.

Copy link
Contributor

@keithchong keithchong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like removing GOMAXPROCS is what we should do, especially for later versions of Go (we're using 1.25), and allow the runtime to set the value, which is more container aware. Also, Oliver's change has been merged upstream.

https://go.dev/blog/container-aware-gomaxprocs

@keithchong keithchong requested a review from svghadi February 6, 2026 19:45
@keithchong
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @svghadi , I don't have write access to this repo - adding you to review and approve.

@svghadi
Copy link
Member

svghadi commented Feb 9, 2026

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: svghadi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Feb 9, 2026
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gondža <ogondza@gmail.com>
@olivergondza
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rebased to merge cleanly. PTAL, @svghadi

@svghadi
Copy link
Member

svghadi commented Feb 9, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2026

@olivergondza: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v4.19-e2e acbb81d link true /test v4.19-e2e
ci/prow/v4.14-e2e acbb81d link true /test v4.14-e2e
ci/prow/v4.14-kuttl-parallel acbb81d link false /test v4.14-kuttl-parallel
ci/prow/v4.14-kuttl-sequential acbb81d link false /test v4.14-kuttl-sequential

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@olivergondza
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This should not influence the test execution in any way...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants