Skip to content

RDKB-63382: [MLO] Implement standard TR-181 DM for MLO configuration#874

Open
stanislavkuchar2 wants to merge 1 commit intordkcentral:developfrom
stanislavkuchar2:mlo_standardized_dm_1
Open

RDKB-63382: [MLO] Implement standard TR-181 DM for MLO configuration#874
stanislavkuchar2 wants to merge 1 commit intordkcentral:developfrom
stanislavkuchar2:mlo_standardized_dm_1

Conversation

@stanislavkuchar2
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for change: ImplementTR-181 standard DataModel for MLO configuration: Device.WiFi.SSID.{i}.MLDUnit

Test Procedure: Configure MLO via TR-181 DataModel Device.WiFi.SSID.{i}.MLDUnit,
verify the MLO configuration in driver,
verify MLO Wifi connectivity of clients

Risks: Low
Priority: P1

@stanislavkuchar2 stanislavkuchar2 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2026 15:25
<parameters>
<parameter>
<name>MLDUnit</name>
<type>int</type>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According BBF.
MLDUnit type should be: int(-1,0:24).
in XML format: int[-1:24]

wifi_util_error_print(WIFI_DMCLI,"%s:%d VAP is sta VAP\n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__);
return FALSE;
}
if (iValue < -1 || iValue > MLD_UNIT_COUNT) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, check #925 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, Change implemented

Reason for change: ImplementTR-181 standard DataModel for MLO configuration: Device.WiFi.SSID.{i}.MLDUnit

Test Procedure: Configure MLO via TR-181 DataModel Device.WiFi.SSID.{i}.MLDUnit,
	verify the MLO configuration in driver,
	verify MLO Wifi connectivity of clients

Risks: Low
Priority: P1
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kuchar <stanislav.kuchar@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants