SRE-571: Deploy graph admin endpoint

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Rename the graph-test ECS service references to graph-admin in the backend CD workflow, aligning the deployment pipeline with the admin endpoint introduced in BE-426.

🔗 Related links

• SRE-571: Deploy admin endpoint
• BE-426: Merge graph test-server into admin endpoint in main binary
• BE-423: Add JWT authentication and actor resolution for Graph admin API

🔍 What does this change?

• Rename APP_GRAPH_TEST_SERVICE_NAME → APP_GRAPH_ADMIN_SERVICE_NAME (env variable)
• Update ECS service name from h-stage-euc1-app-graph-test → h-stage-euc1-app-graph-admin
• Update step name from "Redeploy graph-test staging service" → "Redeploy graph-admin staging service"

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

• CD workflow will be validated on merge by deploying the admin service

❓ How to test this?

1. Merge and observe the CD workflow run
2. Confirm the graph-admin ECS service is redeployed successfully

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 6, 2026 11:36am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 6, 2026 11:36am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 6, 2026 11:36am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 6, 2026 11:36am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Changes the staging deployment pipeline’s target ECS service name; a misconfiguration would cause deployments to fail or redeploy the wrong service.

Overview
Updates .github/workflows/hash-backend-cd.yml to replace the graph-test staging service redeploy with a graph-admin redeploy.

This renames the env var used by the workflow and points the redeploy step at h-stage-euc1-app-graph-admin (including updating the step label), aligning CD with the new admin endpoint service.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3d1a981. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[TimDiekmann]

• SRE-571: Deploy graph admin endpoint #8510 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the backend CD workflow to deploy the Graph admin endpoint by replacing the former graph-test service references.

Changes: Renames the env var to APP_GRAPH_ADMIN_SERVICE_NAME and retargets the redeploy step to the h-stage-euc1-app-graph-admin ECS service.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing t/sre-571-deploy-admin-endpoint (3d1a981) with main (313a166)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.65%. Comparing base (313a166) to head (3d1a981).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8510   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.65%   62.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1312     1312           
  Lines      133689   133689           
  Branches     5510     5510           
=======================================
+ Hits        83757    83758    +1     
+ Misses      49018    49017    -1     
  Partials      914      914           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.18% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.460 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$79.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$423 \mathrm{ms} \pm 980 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 507 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$291 \mathrm{ms} \pm 953 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.624 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$98.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 497 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 509 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$572 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.76 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph