⚙️ Core: Decouple Turing Solvers via Adapter#617
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🔧 The Violation:
TuringSystemwas tightly coupled toTuringSolverStrategy, violating OCP and DRY as it prevented the use of standard ODE solvers likeRungeKutta4without duplicating logic.🛠️ The Fix: Implemented the Adapter Pattern. Extracted
TuringDynamicsto implementOdeSystem(centralizing derivative logic) and createdStandardSolverAdapterto allow anyS: Solver<TuringState>to function as aTuringSolverStrategy.📉 Debt Reduction: Removed duplicate potential logic for derivative calculation and enabled standard solver reuse.
🧪 Integrity: Logic preserved (verified via
test_turing_adapter.rsshowing Euler matches Fused Solver), all tests passed.PR created automatically by Jules for task 14244186239046676124 started by @fderuiter