Sxxx - some adjustments

[mariusheine]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Test Results

131 tests  ±0   131 ✅ ±0   26s ⏱️ +4s
 31 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 31 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e666bb0. ± Comparison against base commit 3674834.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@1dc3502b
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@59696551
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@15c4af7a
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@55d58825
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@29a98d9f
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@795faad, expected=multi/container-id/2025652936/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@69f3e556, expected=multi/456/1206258545/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@99c3cee, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/1482010861/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@60ab895f, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/1097632693/123/other=xxx]

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@5e5af8e1
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@4228bf58
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@2938127d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@ff23ae7
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@2b7962a2
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@69d7bc1a, expected=multi/container-id/1170475172/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@6e668322, expected=multi/456/88332821/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@6475e778, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/1841931630/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@acd3460, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/82436294/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[TruongQuangSB]

@mariusheine I think, the width of "calculate missing table panel" be equal the table width or fill whole view

[mariusheine]

@mariusheine I think, the width of "calculate missing table panel" be equal the table width or fill whole view

@TruongQuangSB I think then it is nicer to fill the whole view. And you mean that the yellow background should take the full width and that the button is on the right side, correct?

[TruongQuangSB]

@mariusheine I think, the width of "calculate missing table panel" be equal the table width or fill whole view

@TruongQuangSB I think then it is nicer to fill the whole view. And you mean that the yellow background should take the full width and that the button is on the right side, correct?

@mariusheine yes. You can see the Banderole.java, here haved we the top-panel for the view already defined. For this fall need we only override the labe & the buttion action