Skip to content

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126

Open
mariusheine wants to merge 33 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing
Open

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126
mariusheine wants to merge 33 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing

Conversation

@mariusheine
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Test Results

131 tests  ±0   131 ✅ ±0   29s ⏱️ +2s
 31 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 31 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7485d48. ± Comparison against base commit 3141639.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@1dc3502b
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@59696551
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@15c4af7a
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@55d58825
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@29a98d9f
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@795faad, expected=multi/container-id/2025652936/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@69f3e556, expected=multi/456/1206258545/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@99c3cee, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/1482010861/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@60ab895f, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/1097632693/123/other=xxx]
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@5e5af8e1
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@4228bf58
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@2938127d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@ff23ae7
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@2b7962a2
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@210d3a42, expected=multi/container-id/213063852/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@6f4adaab, expected=multi/456/1978560393/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@75bf9e67, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/679137498/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@45c408a4, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/444700929/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Contributor

/license-check

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 09:12
- name: Eslint
run: cd web/textviewer && npm run lint

test-siteplan:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mariusheine i think, we should make own workflow for all testing, also swtbot and this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB Yeah good idea. I will adjust the workflows

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB For simplicity I kept the swtbot test in the ci workflow. In my opinion and with all I tried it is not worth the benefit. Maybe we can try again later but for now let's keep it like that. At least I put the siteplan testing into a separate workflow

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comment

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

License summary

⚠️ Failed to process DEPENDENCIES.

  • Committers can request a license review via by commenting /request-license-review.
  • After all reviews have concluded, Committers can re-run the license-vetting check by commenting /license-check

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-set/set/actions/runs/22659391677

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants