x86: Use general multianewarray implementation#23484
Merged
0xdaryl merged 1 commit intoeclipse-openj9:masterfrom Mar 12, 2026
Merged
x86: Use general multianewarray implementation#234840xdaryl merged 1 commit intoeclipse-openj9:masterfrom
0xdaryl merged 1 commit intoeclipse-openj9:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Spencer Comin <spencer.comin@ibm.com>
Contributor
|
Jenkins test sanity xlinux,win,osx jdk21 |
0xdaryl
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another piece of #22562 that got missed when reopened as #23390. With the formatting change and the rush to fix #23385, the call to
generate2DArrayWithInlineAllocatorswas dropped.Internal testing: http://vmfarm.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/build_info.php?build_id=113831.
Showing that this passes the failing tests from #23385: http://vmfarm.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/build_diff_by_status.php?build_id_old=112671&from_state=FAILED&build_id_new=113831&to_state=PASSED