Feature: implementation of jtagtap_cycle for JLink backend
#2182
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Detailed description
jtagtap_cycle()in jlink.c backend used by BMDA. (and it didn't even exist until very recently)Tracking: #2180.
Note that
jlink_jtag_init()used to rely on a directjlink_transfer()of a baked byte buffer with 56 idle clocks and SWD-to-JTAG switch sequence, I replaced that with ajlink_jtag_cycle()call for 56-5=51 clocks and a shorter, 16-bit sequence. The caveat is that new function may raise an exception, and at scan time it results in immediate SIGABRT because it's unhandled (by any TRY-CATCH up the callsite). It also happens to be the first 0xCF opcode transfer. If such behaviour is unwanted, discard commit 1.Tested on J-Link V9 against a RISC-V MCU.
Your checklist for this pull request
Closing issues