Skip to content

Conversation

@neo-jesse
Copy link
Collaborator

@neo-jesse neo-jesse commented Jan 8, 2026

Fix numeric tag sorting in internal-release.py

Tags like internal@v9, internal@v10, internal@v23 were being sorted alphabetically, causing v9 to appear as the latest (since '9' > '2' in ASCII). This fix extracts the numeric version and sorts by that instead, correctly identifying internal@v23 as the latest tag.

@neo-jesse neo-jesse marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 21:40
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.31%. Comparing base (cca981e) to head (be2d9b1).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #20507      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.03%   56.31%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files        3679     3633      -46     
  Lines      310579   306839    -3740     
  Branches    45838    45951     +113     
==========================================
- Hits       174048   172804    -1244     
+ Misses     136288   133790    -2498     
- Partials      243      245       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 46.09% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
shared-data 1.93% <ø> (-70.19%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 81 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whoops!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants