Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix bug in
TDMS_TimeSecondwhere year 1904 started counting days from 0, but other years from 1. Now holds thatTDMS_TimeSecond(1904, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) == 0.Sadly, the official docs LabVIEW Timestamp Overview have an incorrect time for 2002-01-01 00:00:00, it should be
TDMS_TimeSecond(2002, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) == 3092688000, not 3092601600. This is discussed in this forum post.Additionally optimize full years. Instead of looping over all months, directly add 365 days (or 366 for leap year). This is roughly 10x speedup.