Conversation
…nted out legacy logging options from application.properties; bump to v26.2
labkey-willm
requested review from
labkey-jeckels,
labkey-jony and
labkey-stuartm
labkey-jeckels
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
Contributor
labkey-jeckels
left a comment
labkey-jeckels
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Two questions for you, but looks OK to me.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale
log4j config setup would throw an error if json logging wasn't enabled,
log4j.configurationFile must be in the form log4j2.xml[,secondaryFile]. Leaving the -D option out entirely if we don't need it avoids this.Related Pull Requests
Changes