fix: adding carot to packages for standardization

[jaredwray]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• Followed the Contributing guidelines and Code of Conduct
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
fix: adding carot to packages for standardization

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving dependency management and repository hygiene. It standardizes the versioning of all dependencies within the package.json file by introducing caret prefixes, which allows for automatic adoption of compatible minor and patch updates. This approach enhances maintainability and reduces the need for manual version bumps. Additionally, the .gitignore file was updated to remove an obsolete entry.

Highlights

• Dependency Versioning Standardization: Standardized dependency versioning in package.json by adding caret (^) prefixes to all devDependencies and dependencies. This change ensures that the project can automatically benefit from compatible minor and patch updates, aligning with best practices for dependency management.
• Gitignore Cleanup: Cleaned up the .gitignore file by removing the entry for pnpm-lock.yaml, which was no longer needed.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• .gitignore
  • Removed pnpm-lock.yaml from the ignore list.
• package.json
  • Standardized dependency versioning by adding caret (^) prefixes to all devDependencies and dependencies.
  • Updated dotenv package version from 17.2.3 to ^17.2.4.

Activity

• No human activity (comments, reviews, etc.) has been recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d0543c3) to head (dcccce0).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #26   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            3         3           
  Lines           19        19           
  Branches         1         1           
=========================================
  Hits            19        19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request standardizes dependency versions in package.json by adding caret ranges and begins tracking the pnpm-lock.yaml file. These are positive changes for ensuring reproducible builds while allowing for non-breaking updates. My main feedback is to consider a stricter versioning strategy for devDependencies. I've left a specific comment suggesting the use of tilde (~) ranges instead of carets (^) to improve the stability of the development and CI environment.