test(suite): set up initial testsuite by Datata1 · Pull Request #36 · Datata1/codesphere-python

Datata1 · 2026-02-03T12:18:52Z

No description provided.

github-actions · 2026-02-03T12:19:11Z

🛡️ Bandit Security Scan Results

✅ No security issues found by Bandit.

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR establishes a comprehensive test suite for the Codesphere Python SDK, including both unit and integration tests. The changes refactor the SDK's internal architecture to support lazy operation loading (avoiding circular imports), add extensive test coverage across all resource types, and provide integration test infrastructure with automated workspace setup/cleanup.

Changes:

Set up complete test infrastructure with unit and integration tests covering Teams, Workspaces, Domains, Environment Variables, and Metadata resources
Refactored SDK internals to use lazy operation loading via _execute_operation() method, eliminating circular import issues
Added integration test workflow with session-scoped test workspace management and environment variable configuration
Updated documentation with testing guidelines and separated command schemas to resolve import cycles

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 70 out of 87 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/test_client.py	Migrated client tests to class-based structure with improved fixtures
tests/resources/workspace/test_workspace.py	Added comprehensive workspace resource unit tests
tests/resources/workspace/env_vars/test_env_vars.py	Added environment variables manager unit tests
tests/resources/team/test_team.py	Added team resource unit tests
tests/resources/team/domain/test_domain.py	Added domain resource unit tests
tests/resources/metadata/test_metadata.py	Added metadata resource unit tests
tests/integration/test_*.py	Added integration tests for all major resources
tests/integration/conftest.py	Added session-scoped workspace fixtures for integration tests
tests/conftest.py	Added shared test fixtures and mock factories
tests/resources/conftest.py	Added resource-specific test fixtures
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/schemas.py	Refactored to use lazy operation loading and separated command schemas
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/command_schemas.py	Extracted command-related schemas to avoid circular imports
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars/schemas.py	Separated EnvVar schema to avoid circular imports
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars/models.py	Refactored to use lazy operation loading
src/codesphere/resources/metadata/schemas.py	Added explicit Field validation aliases for CPU/RAM/etc fields
src/codesphere/core/handler.py	Enhanced null checks and removed debug logging
src/codesphere/core/base.py	Added serialize_by_alias configuration
src/codesphere/config.py	Added extra="ignore" to allow additional CS_* env vars
Makefile	Added test-unit and test-integration targets
.github/workflows/integration.yml	Added integration test GitHub Actions workflow
CONTRIBUTING.md	Added comprehensive testing guidelines section
examples/*	Removed example files (likely to be regenerated)

tests/integration/conftest.py

tests/integration/test_domains.py

src/codesphere/resources/workspace/schemas.py

src/codesphere/resources/metadata/schemas.py

tests/integration/conftest.py

src/codesphere/core/handler.py

github-actions · 2026-02-07T11:38:28Z

Pytest Coverage Report

File	Stmts	Miss	Cover	Missing
src/codesphere
client.py	22	0	100%
config.py	9	0	100%
exceptions.py	7	3	57%	11–12, 16
http_client.py	54	5	90%	80–81, 83–85
utils.py	27	16	40%	12–13, 26–32, 34–35, 40–43, 45
src/codesphere/core
base.py	19	0	100%
handler.py	91	13	85%	118–120, 125–130, 136–137, 140–141
operations.py	11	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/metadata
operations.py	6	0	100%
resources.py	20	0	100%
schemas.py	28	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/team
operations.py	6	0	100%
resources.py	17	0	100%
schemas.py	26	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/team/domain
manager.py	30	0	100%
operations.py	10	0	100%
resources.py	31	4	87%	45, 48–50
schemas.py	35	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/workspace
operations.py	11	0	100%
resources.py	18	0	100%
schemas.py	76	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars
models.py	32	2	93%	39–40
operations.py	6	0	100%
schemas.py	4	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/landscape
models.py	0	0	100%
resources.py	0	0	100%
src/codesphere/resources/workspace/pipeline
models.py	0	0	100%
resources.py	0	0	100%
TOTAL	596	43	92%

Test Execution Summary

Tests	Skipped	Failures	Errors	Time
112	0 💤	0 ❌	0 🔥	1.435s ⏱️

github-actions · 2026-02-07T11:46:21Z

Integration Test Results

26 tests 26 ✅ 50s ⏱️
1 suites 0 💤
1 files 0 ❌

Results for commit ac2df3c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 63 out of 81 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.

Copilot · 2026-02-07T11:50:22Z

src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars/models.py

-        default=_BULK_SET_OP,
-        exclude=True,
-    )
+        return await self._execute_operation(_GET_OP)


WorkspaceEnvVarManager.get() is annotated to return List[EnvVar] but it returns the raw operation result. If _GET_OP returns ResourceList[EnvVar] (consistent with other list endpoints), callers will receive a ResourceList instead of a list. Consider mirroring other resources: result = await ...; return result.root (or change the return annotation/docstring to ResourceList[EnvVar]). This also makes the behavior consistent with TeamsResource.list() / WorkspacesResource.list().

Suggested change

return await self._execute_operation(_GET_OP)

result: ResourceList[EnvVar] = await self._execute_operation(_GET_OP)

return result.root

Copilot · 2026-02-07T11:50:22Z

src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars/models.py

    async def set(
        self, env_vars: Union[ResourceList[EnvVar], List[Dict[str, str]]]
    ) -> None:


The type hints for set()/delete() don’t include List[EnvVar], but the unit tests call these methods with lists of EnvVar instances. Updating the annotations to include List[EnvVar] (and possibly broadening to a Sequence[...]) will align the public API with actual supported usage and avoid confusing type-checker errors.

Copilot · 2026-02-07T11:50:22Z

src/codesphere/resources/workspace/envVars/models.py

-    )
+        await self._execute_operation(_BULK_SET_OP, data=payload.model_dump())

    async def delete(self, items: Union[List[str], ResourceList[EnvVar]]) -> None:


The type hints for set()/delete() don’t include List[EnvVar], but the unit tests call these methods with lists of EnvVar instances. Updating the annotations to include List[EnvVar] (and possibly broadening to a Sequence[...]) will align the public API with actual supported usage and avoid confusing type-checker errors.

Copilot · 2026-02-07T11:50:22Z

tests/resources/conftest.py

+def mock_http_client_for_resource(mock_response_factory):
+    """
+    Create a configurable mock HTTP client for resource testing.
+
+    Returns a factory function that creates configured mock clients.
+    """
+
+    def _create(response_data: Any, status_code: int = 200) -> MagicMock:
+        mock_client = MagicMock()
+        mock_response = mock_response_factory.create(
+            status_code=status_code,
+            json_data=response_data,
+        )
+        mock_client.request = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response)
+        return mock_client
+
+    return _create
+
+
+@pytest.fixture
+def teams_resource_factory(mock_http_client_for_resource):
+    """Factory for creating TeamsResource instances with mock data."""
+
+    def _create(response_data: Any):
+        from codesphere.resources.team import TeamsResource
+
+        mock_client = mock_http_client_for_resource(response_data)
+        resource = TeamsResource(http_client=mock_client)
+        return resource, mock_client
+
+    return _create
+
+
+@pytest.fixture
+def workspaces_resource_factory(mock_http_client_for_resource):
+    """Factory for creating WorkspacesResource instances with mock data."""
+
+    def _create(response_data: Any):
+        from codesphere.resources.workspace import WorkspacesResource
+
+        mock_client = mock_http_client_for_resource(response_data)
+        resource = WorkspacesResource(http_client=mock_client)
+        return resource, mock_client
+
+    return _create
+
+
+@pytest.fixture


This fixture (and several factories below it) duplicates implementations already present in tests/conftest.py with the same fixture names. Keeping two versions increases the chance of behavior drift and makes it harder to know which fixture is used (pytest will prefer the closest conftest.py). Consider reusing the root fixtures instead (e.g., remove the duplicates here, or rename these to resource-specific names and delegate to the shared factory).

Suggested change

def mock_http_client_for_resource(mock_response_factory):

"""

Create a configurable mock HTTP client for resource testing.

Returns a factory function that creates configured mock clients.

"""

def _create(response_data: Any, status_code: int = 200) -> MagicMock:

mock_client = MagicMock()

mock_response = mock_response_factory.create(

status_code=status_code,

json_data=response_data,

)

mock_client.request = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response)

return mock_client

return _create

@pytest.fixture

def teams_resource_factory(mock_http_client_for_resource):

"""Factory for creating TeamsResource instances with mock data."""

def _create(response_data: Any):

from codesphere.resources.team import TeamsResource

mock_client = mock_http_client_for_resource(response_data)

resource = TeamsResource(http_client=mock_client)

return resource, mock_client

return _create

@pytest.fixture

def workspaces_resource_factory(mock_http_client_for_resource):

"""Factory for creating WorkspacesResource instances with mock data."""

def _create(response_data: Any):

from codesphere.resources.workspace import WorkspacesResource

mock_client = mock_http_client_for_resource(response_data)

resource = WorkspacesResource(http_client=mock_client)

return resource, mock_client

return _create

@pytest.fixture

@pytest.fixture

Copilot · 2026-02-07T11:50:23Z

tests/test_client.py

+    def test_client_initialization(self, api_http_client, mock_token):
+        """Client should initialize with token from settings."""
+        assert api_http_client._token == mock_token


The test suite no longer covers the negative initialization path (e.g., missing/empty token leading to an authentication/config error). Adding a test for the failure case would improve coverage of client setup and prevent regressions in the settings/token handling logic.

src/codesphere/core/handler.py

test(suite): set up initial testsuite

126475e

Datata1 self-assigned this Feb 3, 2026

refactor(examples): remove examples to replace them

2dd3b2f

Datata1 requested a review from Copilot February 3, 2026 13:41

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Datata1 added 4 commits February 7, 2026 12:24

test: review

511e941

test: change ci

f3769c9

test: fix ci

5cfbffc

test: fix ci

b3946ec

Datata1 added 3 commits February 7, 2026 12:38

test: fix ci

4d5a48e

test: fix ci

798f005

test: fix ci

81f9a2e

Datata1 requested a review from Copilot February 7, 2026 11:47

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

test: fix ci

ac2df3c

Datata1 merged commit 14fac2e into main Feb 7, 2026
4 checks passed

	return await self._execute_operation(_GET_OP)
	result: ResourceList[EnvVar] = await self._execute_operation(_GET_OP)
	return result.root

Conversation

Datata1 commented Feb 3, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🛡️ Bandit Security Scan Results

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Execution Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Integration Test Results

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading