INCIDENT-37491: ocitool copy content: add retry mechanism #88
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![datadog-datadog-prod-us1[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/365230?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
georgesfarah
force-pushed
the
georges.farah/ocitool-push-retry
branch
4 times, most recently
from
cb5e0cb to
c3e2a4d
Compare
georgesfarah
force-pushed
the
georges.farah/ocitool-push-retry
branch
3 times, most recently
from
fa24f81 to
ce43928
Compare
georgesfarah
changed the title
georgesfarah
force-pushed
the
georges.farah/ocitool-push-retry
branch
from
ce43928 to
9984f4a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Added a retry mechanism for the
ocitoolcommands: Now we are retrying theCopy Content3 times instead of 1.This PR is a fix for: https://app.datadoghq.com/incidents/37491
used the lib github.com/sethvargo/go-retry
Validation
Currently testing it on the big DataDog repo. Not sharing the details since this PR is in a public repo