Open
Conversation
Detects sequential await in for...of loops that could be parallelized with Promise.all. Smart about order-dependent patterns: skips loops that push to arrays, have cross-iteration variable dependencies, or use break/return for early exit. Flags only when parallelization is safe.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
prefer-promise-allrule that detects sequentialawaitinfor...ofloops that could be parallelized withPromise.all(items.map(async ...)).push(),.unshift(),.splice()to arraysbreak/return(early exit depends on sequential evaluation)for await...of(async iterator pattern)Heuristics
The rule flags when all of these are true:
for...of(notfor,while, orfor await...of)await(not inside a nested function).push()/.unshift()/.splice()calls (order-dependent accumulation)breakorreturntargeting the loop (sequential early-exit)Test plan
for (const x of items) { await doThing(x); }.push()ed to arraybreakon conditionreturnon conditionlet prev = ...; prev = await ...)total += await ...)for await...of.map()callbackbreakinside switch (not targeting loop)